Effectiveness of adding vildagliptin to the treatment of diabetic patients nonresponsive to the combination of metformin and a sulphonylurea.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of adding vildagliptin to the treatment of patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treated with a combination of metformin and a sulphonylurea. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: 37 T2DM patients with HbA1c ranging from 7.7% to 12.4% (mean of 9.30 ± 1.38), despite the use of metformin in combination with a sulphonylurea, were additionally treated with vildagliptin (100 mg/day) for at least 6 months. RESULTS: During triple oral therapy (TOT) HbA1c levels < 7% were achieved in 11 patients (29.7%), whereas levels of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) < 120 mg/dL were observed in 12 patients (32.4%). Both findings were observed in 10 patients (27.0%). Compared to nonresponsive subjects, lower mean baseline HbA1c and FPG levels were seen in responsive patients, but the difference was only statistically significant for fasting plasma glucose (FPG). Moreover, there was considerable overlap between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary results suggest that TOT with metformin, a sulphonylurea and vildagliptin may be useful for some T2DM patients nonresponsive to combination therapy with metformin and sulphonylurea.

Effectiveness of adding vildagliptin to the treatment of diabetic patients nonresponsive to the combination of metformin and a sulphonylurea / Eficácia da adição de vildagliptina ao tratamento de pacientes diabéticos não responsivos à combinação de metformina e uma sulfonilureia

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of adding vildagliptin to the treatment of patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treated with a combination of metformin and a sulphonylurea. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: 37 T2DM patients with HbA1c ranging from 7.7 percent to 12.4 percent (mean of 9.30 ± 1.38), despite the use of metformin in combination with a sulphonylurea, were additionally treated with vildagliptin (100 mg/day) for at least 6 months. RESULTS: During triple oral therapy (TOT) HbA1c levels < 7 percent were achieved in 11 patients (29.7 percent), whereas levels of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) < 120 mg/dL were observed in 12 patients (32.4 percent). Both findings were observed in 10 patients (27.0 percent). Compared to nonresponsive subjects, lower mean baseline HbA1c and FPG levels were seen in responsive patients, but the difference was only statistically significant for fasting plasma glucose (FPG). Moreover, there was considerable overlap between the two groups. CONLUSION: Our preliminary results suggest that TOT with metformin, a sulphonylurea and vildagliptin may be useful for some T2DM patients nonresponsive to combination therapy with metformin and sulphonylurea.

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a eficácia da adição de vildagliptina ao tratamento de pacientes com diabetes melito tipo 2 (DM2) inadequadamente controlados com a terapia de combinação com metformina e sulfonilureia. SUJEITOS E MÉTODOS: 37 pacientes com DM2 e HbA1c variando entre 7,7 por cento e 12,4 por cento (média, 9,30 ± 1,38), apesar do uso de metformina associada a uma sulfonilureia, foram adicionalmente tratados com vildagliptina (100 mg/dia) durante, pelo menos, 6 meses. RESULTADOS: Durante a terapia oral tripla TOT), níveis de HbA1c < 7 por cento foram alcançados em 11 pacientes (27,9 por cento), enquanto a glicemia de jejum (GJ) < 120 mg/dL foi observada em 12 pacientes (32,4.1 por cento). Ambos os resultados foram descritos em 10 pacientes (27,0 por cento). Em comparação com indivíduos não responsivos, os pacientes responsivos tinham níveis basais mais baixos de HbA1c e GJ, mas a diferença foi estatisticamente significativa somente para glicemia de jejum. Além disso, houve grande sobre-posição entre os dois grupos. CONSLUSÃO: Nossos resultados preliminares sugerem que a TOT com metformina, uma sulfonilureia e vildagliptina pode ser útil para alguns pacientes com DM2 não responsivos à combinação com metformina e uma sulfonilureia.

Comparison of metformin, gliclazide MR and rosiglitazone in monotherapy and in combination for type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of metformin, rosiglitazone and gliclazide MR as monotherapy and in combination in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: 250 patients treated with oral antidiabetic agents for at least 24 weeks in monotherapy or in combination therapy were included in this retrospective study. RESULTS: As monotherapy the reduction of fasting plasma glucose (FPG), postprandial glycemia (PPG) and HbA1c was similar with the three drugs after 24 weeks. Among patients on combination therapy, the reduction in HbA1c, FPG and PPG was significantly lower with rosiglitazone plus metformin, as compared to metformin plus gliclazide MR or gliclazide MR plus rosiglitazone. Patients treated with rosiglitazone achieved less favorable changes in lipid profile. CONCLUSION: In monotherapy all drugs were equally effective in improving glycemic control, whereas the combination of metformin plus gliclazide MR provided the best results concerning the improvement of both, glycemic control and lipid profile.

Comparison of metformin, gliclazide MR and rosiglitazone in monotherapy and in combination for type 2 diabetes / Comparação de metformina, gliclazida MR e rosiglitazona em monoterapia e em combinação para o diabetes tipo 2

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of metformin, rosiglitazone and gliclazide MR as monotherapy and in combination in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: 250 patients treated with oral antidiabetic agents for at least 24 weeks in monotherapy or in combination therapy were included in this retrospective study. RESULTS: As monotherapy the reduction of fasting plasma glucose (FPG), postprandial glycemia (PPG) and HbA1c was similar with the three drugs after 24 weeks. Among patients on combination therapy, the reduction in HbA1c, FPG and PPG was significantly lower with rosiglitazone plus metformin, as compared to metformin plus gliclazide MR or gliclazide MR plus rosiglitazone. Patients treated with rosiglitazone achieved less favorable changes in lipid profile. CONCLUSION: In monotherapy all drugs were equally effective in improving glycemic control, whereas the combination of metformin plus gliclazide MR provided the best results concerning the improvement of both, glycemic control and lipid profile.

OBJETIVO: Comparar a eficácia e a tolerabilidade da metformina, rosiglitazona e gliclazida MR em monoterapia ou em combinação no tratamento do diabetes tipo 2. SUJEITOS E MÉTODOS: 250 pacientes tratados com antidiabéticos orais por pelo menos 24 semanas, em monoterapia ou em terapia combinada, foram incluídos neste estudo retrospectivo. RESULTADOS: Como monoterapia, a redução da glicemia de jejum (GJ), glicemia pós-prandial (GPP) e HbA1c foi similar com as três drogas, após 24 semanas. Entre os pacientes em terapia combinada, a redução da HbA1c, GJ e GPP foi significativamente menor com rosiglitazona e metformina, em comparação com metformina e gliclazida MR ou gliclazida MR mais rosiglitazona. Os pacientes tratados com rosiglitazona obtiveram mudanças menos favoráveis no perfil lipídico. CONCLUSÃO: Em monoterapia todos os medicamentos foram igualmente eficazes na melhora do controle glicêmico, enquanto a combinação de metformina e gliclazida MR proporcionou os melhores resultados relativos à melhoria de ambos, controle glicêmico e perfil lipídico.

Effectiveness of cabergoline in monotherapy and combined with ketoconazole in the management of Cushing's disease.

The expression of dopamine receptor subtypes has been reported in corticotroph adenomas, and this finding support the possibility for medical treatment of Cushing's disease (CD) with dopamine agonists when conventional treatment has failed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of cabergoline (at doses of up 3 mg/week), alone or combined with relatively low doses of ketoconazole (up to 400 mg/day), in 12 patients with CD unsuccessfully treated by transsphenoidal surgery. After 6 months of cabergoline therapy, normalization of 24 h urinary free cortisol (UFC) levels occurred in three patients (25%) at doses ranging from 2-3 mg/week, whereas reductions ranging from 15.0 to 48.4% were found in the remaining. The addition of ketonocazole to the nine patients without an adequate response to cabergoline was able to normalize UFC excretion in six patients (66.7%) at doses of 200 mg/day (three patients), 300 mg/day (two patients) and 400 mg/day (one patient). In the remaining patients UFC levels did not normalize but a significant reduction ranging from to 44.4 to 51.7% was achieved. In two of the six responsive patients to combination therapy, the weekly dose of cabergoline could be later reduced from 3 to 2 mg. Our findings demonstrated that cabergoline monotherapy was able to reverse hypercortisolism in 25% of patients with CD unsuccessfully treated by surgery. Moreover, the addition of relatively low doses of ketoconazole led to normalization of UFC in about two-thirds of patients not achieving a full response to cabergoline.